20210908, 00:29  #56  
Jun 2012
3,203 Posts 
Quote:
Fair enough, I was only counting the declared ranges. You’re right of course EdH must have searched high up the mountain. Quote:
Personally, I’ve gotten in the habit of jumping to higher admin, say 30M+, and using incr=4620. Often generates reasonable polys within a week or two. But your recent examples have made a believer out me  stick with 420 for as long as you can! I’m using it locally on a G193 job now. Slow but sure can win the race, or at least generate better quality polynomials. 

20210909, 22:51  #57  
Apr 2020
498_{10} Posts 
Quote:
Code:
n: 533439167600904850230361756102700151678687933392166847323827307497363839257031077774321424872955045754669625577486179222154434651598903112919949771321416511589029559325246084363632977829645558547714072241 skew: 338012013.442 c0: 39995364790245999480244642774391120587683667437750 c1: 663343854938705696739096400303369099559943 c2: 2554996497228376927871276092481512 c3: 16634883235399116321901043 c4: 14147480163732582 c5: 2484720 Y0: 3361764766011432381851898081097482786808 Y1: 1134911427375579461125271 

20210912, 15:30  #58 
Apr 2020
2·3·83 Posts 
Continued up to 35M. Best score was 2.807e15, probably good enough for sieving?
Code:
n: 533439167600904850230361756102700151678687933392166847323827307497363839257031077774321424872955045754669625577486179222154434651598903112919949771321416511589029559325246084363632977829645558547714072241 skew: 190550095.962 c0: 4270861597978000348273667478612159513444633369624 c1: 301982688153622958148557487129513846465195 c2: 718476090251496284529736703791030 c3: 12811377464083267088449895 c4: 31157665354464146 c5: 55931400 Y0: 1803400746044964489961544593826293030270 Y1: 15050066776523075044713587 
20210912, 18:55  #59 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
2^{2}·163 Posts 
Are those two last polynomials already spun?

20210912, 20:44  #60 
Apr 2020
762_{8} Posts 
I haven't run anything beyond basic CADO poly selection. Feel free to try spinning with EdH's script. I think Max does some more things that are known only to him.

20210912, 21:04  #61 
"Oliver"
Sep 2017
Porta Westfalica, DE
652_{10} Posts 
In this case I'd like to ask Max if he would be willing to apply his special sauce here?

20210912, 21:12  #62 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
4,001 Posts 
I've given up on my script, at least for CADONFS polys. Max and Gimarel do stuff with Msieve that I haven't figured out yet. If I ever do, I'll add it to the script. Also, Max does some rebalancing of coefficients with Maple that I haven't been able to program.

20210912, 22:05  #63 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3^{3}×5×37 Posts 
Judging by the records for 200201202, a 3.0 should be possible. Like Kruoli, I'll hope for some lucky spin!

20210913, 22:02  #64 
"Max"
Jun 2016
Toronto
1612_{8} Posts 

20210914, 14:24  #65 
Apr 2010
2^{3}×23 Posts 
I'll try to get a better poly with msievegpu.

20210914, 18:14  #66 
"Evan"
Dec 2020
Montreal
71 Posts 
I've been trying to run some polyselect with the individual sopt/ropt binaries. Is there a good way to sort out a certain amount of the highest scoring polynomials after the size optimization phase? I found a script from Dubslow from a few years ago, but it doesn't seem to work on the files I have. I have a feeling it's something to do with the fact that CADO doesn't output MurphyE values from the sopt run, only the ropt run.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Using 16e on smaller numbers  fivemack  Factoring  3  20170919 08:52 
NFS on smaller numbers?  skan  YAFU  6  20130226 13:57 
Bernoulli(200) c204  akruppa  Factoring  114  20120820 14:01 
checking smaller number  fortega  Data  2  20050616 22:48 
Factoring Smaller Numbers  marc  Factoring  6  20041009 14:17 